Should
you invest in PPF or ELSS?
Upfront let’s be
honest. Comparing one to the other is not completely fair, given the fact that
both are completely different products and target different needs in a
portfolio. While PPF is a great investment for every single investor, so is
equity.
So why are we
comparing the two?
Here’s why.
The Public Provident
Fund, or PPF, and an equity linked savings plan, or ELSS, are both eligible for
a deduction under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act. So the amount invested in
either is eligible for a deduction up to Rs 1.50 lakh. (Frankly, that’s pretty
much where their similarity ends). As a result, both investments score high on
the tax front.
In the case of PPF,
the interest earned is tax free and the entire amount on maturity (principal +
interest accumulated) is also tax free. It is a win-win situation all the way.
Or in technical terms, EEE –indicating that it is exempt from tax at three
stages. (Read: How to position PPF in your portfolio).
Where ELSS is
concerned, the money has to stay invested for a minimum of 36 months. Which
means that long-term capital gains is zero. So no tax here too.
Having said that,
would it be logical to conclude that it makes no difference which one to opt
for?
Not at all.
ELSS does have a
benefit in the sense of its lock-in period being much shorter; three years is
definitely more attractive than the 15 of PPF. So on the liquidity front it
scores. But the stark difference lies in the risk of each product.
On the face of it, if
one looks at the risk of losing one’s capital, ELSS stands nowhere close to
PPF. After all stocks have a much higher level of risk in that you could lose
your money. This does not even arise in the case of PPF which is a fixed return
investment backed by the government. You are guaranteed your capital back as
well as a pre-determined return. No such guarantees in the case of ELSS.
However, if one looks
at the tax-saving category of mutual funds, the average annualized returns over
past 15 years (17.13%), 10 years (9.52%), 5 years (10.24%) and 3 years
(14.39%), investors would not be unhappy. Yes, in the short term the returns
can be devastating (the 1-year return is -14%), but invest in a sound ELSS for
the long term and you will be rewarded. (Read: How to pick a tax-saving fund).
The returns of PPF
have actually declined over time: 12% to 11% to 9.5% to 9% and 8%. Over the
past few years, it has hovered between 8.6% and 8.8%.
When investing,
investors must also consider shortfall risk. This is the risk that an
investment’s actual return will not be sufficient to generate the money needed
to meet one’s investment goals. That is why equity is so crucial in an
investor’s portfolio because good equity investments over the long term do
provide returns which outpace inflation. According to Inflation.edu, the average CPI in
India over the past 10 years has fluctuated from 5.79% (2006) to 12.11% (2010).
If investors invested
all their money in fixed return investments like PPF, there is a very high
probability that they would certainly not save sufficiently for retirement,
unless they were earning obscene amounts of money. To create wealth, you need
to be invested in equity.
So if your overall
equity exposure is less than desired, considering your risk profile and age,
then you could look at ELSS. If your portfolio does have a considerable
exposure to equity, then you could just go with PPF.
The conclusion: As we
mentioned in Be holistic in your tax planning, make your final
decision in conjunction with your entire portfolio.
Happy Investing
Source:Morningstar.in
No comments:
Post a Comment