Translate

Tuesday 31 October 2017

Stocks Basics : What are Stocks?

Stocks Basics : What are Stocks?


You’ve probably heard a popular definition of what a stock is: “A stock is a share in the ownership of a company. Stock represents a claim on the company's assets and earnings. As you acquire more stock, your ownership stake in the company becomes greater.” Unfortunately, this definition is incorrect in some key ways.


To start with, stock holders do not own corporations; they own shares issued by corporations. But corporations are a special type of organization because the law treats them as legal persons. In other words, corporations file taxes, can borrow, can own property, can be sued, etc. The idea that a corporation is a “person” means that the corporation owns its own assets. A corporate office full of chairs and tables belong to the corporation, and not to the shareholders.


This distinction is important because corporate property is legally separated from the property of shareholders, which limits the liability of both the corporation and the shareholder. If the corporation goes bankrupt, a judge may order all of its assets sold – but your personal assets are not at risk. The court cannot even force you to sell your shares, although the value of your shares will have fallen drastically. Likewise, if a major shareholder goes bankrupt, she cannot sell the company’s assets to pay off her creditors.


What shareholders own are shares issued by the corporation; and the corporation owns the assets. So if you own 33% of the shares of a company, it is incorrect to assert that you own one-third of that company; it is instead correct to state that you own 100% of one-third of the company’s shares. Shareholders cannot do as they please with a corporation or its assets. A shareholder can’t walk out with a chair because the corporation owns that chair, not the shareholder. This is known as the “separation of ownership and control.”


Find a reliable way to trade with Investopedia's broker reviews.


So what good are shares, then, if they aren’t actually the ownership rights we think they are? Owning stock gives you the right to vote in shareholder meetings, receive dividends (which are the company’s profits) if and when they are distributed, and it gives you the right to sell your shares to somebody else.


If you own a majority of shares, your voting power increases so that you can indirectly control the direction of a company by appointing its board of directors. This becomes most apparent when one company buys another: the acquiring company doesn’t go around buying up the building, the chairs, the employees; it buys up all the shares. The board of directors is responsible for increasing the value of the corporation, and often does so by hiring professional managers, or officers, such as the Chief Executive Officer, or CEO.


For ordinary shareholders, not being able to manage the company isn't such a big deal. The importance of being a shareholder is that you are entitled to a portion of the company's profits, which, as we will see, is the foundation of a stock’s value. The more shares you own, the larger the portion of the profits you get. Many stocks, however, do not pay out dividends, and instead reinvest profits back into growing the company. These retained earnings, however, are still reflected in the value of a stock.


Stocks – sometimes referred to as equity or equities – are issued by companies to raise capital in order to grow the business or undertake new projects. There are important distinctions between whether somebody buys shares directly from the company when it issues them (in the primary market) or from another shareholder (on the secondary market). When the corporation issues shares, it does so in return for money.


Companies can instead raise money through borrowing, either directly as a loan from a bank, or by issuing debt, known as bonds. Bonds are fundamentally different from stocks in a number of ways. First, bondholders are creditors to the corporation, and are entitled to interest as well as repayment of principal. Creditors are given legal priority over other stakeholders in the event of a bankruptcy and will be made whole first if a company is forced to sell assets in order to repay them. Shareholders, on the other hand, are last in line and often receive nothing, or mere pennies on the dollar, in the event of bankruptcy. This implies that stocks are inherently riskier investments that bonds.


The same is true on the upside: bondholders are only entitled to receive the return given by the interest rate agreed upon by the bond, while shareholders can enjoy returns generated by increasing profits, theoretically to infinity. The greater risk attributed to stocks has generally been rewarded by the market. Stocks have historically returned around 8-10% annualized, while bonds return 5-7%.

 Happy Investing
Source:Investopedia.com

Stocks Basics : Introduction

Stocks Basics : Introduction



Turn on the TV news or open a newspaper, surf the internet or listen to the radio, and you will probably come across some information about the stock market: “The Dow Jones closed at record highs”; “The S&P 500 is trading down two-tenths of one percent”; “The stock market is reacting to news from Washington.” The stock market seems to be everywhere in our daily lives, but what exactly is the stock market? And, what are stocks that are bought and sold on this market? What does it mean for you, for your employer, or for your country’s economy when the stock market had “a good day”?

The answers to these questions are not always obvious once we begin to think about what stocks are. For example, you may have heard that owning stock means that you become an owner of that company. But what does that mean? As an "owner" can you rightfully walk into one of its offices and take home a chair or a desk? Can you hire and fire people? Of course, if you only own a small number of shares, you only “own” a small percentage of the company – but what if you own a majority of the shares, could you then take home a chair or fire workers?

In this tutorial, we will answer these questions and more, often going into some depth to explain core concepts. Once you’ve come to grasp these concepts and understand what makes the stock market tick, the hope is that you’ll become a smarter, more informed, and savvy investor. Even if you don’t have a brokerage account of your own and invest with your own money, you may very well be exposed to stocks via your 401(k) retirement account, pension plan, college savings plans, health savings plans, or insurance policies. Once a tool for the rich, the stock market has now turned into the vehicle of choice for growing wealth for many segments of the population. Advances in trading technology and low-cost brokerage services on the internet have opened up stock markets so that today nearly anybody can own stocks with the click of a mouse.

Before proceeding, however, it is important to distinguish between two common uses of the stock market: investing and speculation. Investing is when you hand over your money so that it is put to use for productive projects such as growth or expansion. Investing in a factory, in research and development, in a new business idea – these are all done with the expectation that in the future, the factory, the research, or the startup will be worth more than the original investment. That means you have a reason to believe the factory needs to be expanded, or that you understand broadly the type of research being done and what the payoff might be, or that you understand and believe in the business plan of the new venture. In other words, investing is a rational decision made with an eye to the future. When you invest, your money is intended to be put to work increasing value.

Speculation, on the other hand, is akin to gambling. Speculators purchase something with the hope that they can soon sell it at a higher price, but without necessarily understanding – or even caring – about why the price should go up. Sometimes, speculators have a gut feeling, or are trading on rumor, but ultimately they do not concern themselves with the factory, the R&D, or the business plan. Speculation should not always be viewed as a bad thing, however; speculators add liquidity to markets, and many have done very well for themselves. At the same time, many smart investors have lost their fortunes in the stock market through speculation. The important distinction between investors and speculators is not a normative one, but rather that investors are generally more interested in the processes underlying prices; they are in it for the long haul, while speculators are more interested in the price itself, and with shorter time horizons for making money.


Happy Investing
Source:Investopedia.com

Why active large-cap mutual funds are losing their edge over passive funds


Why active large-cap mutual funds are losing their edge over passive funds

 

Not a day passes without a word on the active versus passive debate in the investment world. In the developed markets, passive funds have overtaken active funds. India, however, has largely remained a market for active funds, believing that the market can still deliver alpha (excess returns over the benchmark). 

While this may have historically been true and, is still true in certain segments, the large-cap category's ability to generate alpha calls for a re-look. 

Large-cap funds have witnessed a fall in alpha compared to the Nifty 50 Total Returns Index (TRI)—which includes dividends, and is the accurate benchmark for active funds—in recent years. 

The average 3-year rolling excess return generated by large-cap funds over Nifty 50 TRI between 2000 and 2007 was 4%. This shrunk to just 1% during 2008-2017. The recent Sebi guidelines now require funds classified as 'largecaps' to hold 80% of their portfolio in securities comprising the top 100 companies by market capitalisation and, if we follow this definition, the alpha portrayed could be even lower.
Large-cap funds' alpha has shrunk
Active large-cap funds' average alpha fell from 4% during 2000-2007, to 1% during 2008-2017.
page13-pic1

 

 

Active large-cap funds were selected as per Value Research categorization.
Excess returns (alpha) over the benchmark, Nifty 50 TRI, have been calculated using average 3-year rolling returns of large-cap funds from Jan 2000 to Sep 2017. Source:ACE MF



So, what is causing this fall in alpha?

Fund size and portfolio overlap 

 With the rise in the number of funds and their sizes, large-cap funds, which typically hold 50-60 stocks, have witnessed overlap in portfolios and have become benchmark huggers. The return differential among large-cap funds was 10% in 2002-2007 and has shrunk to 2% over the last five years.


Huge AUMs have reined in alpha
Large fund sizes have led to overlap in funds' portfolios and has made many of them benchmark huggers.
page13-pic2

 

 

The chart shows the collective rise in the assets under management (AUM) of large-cap funds.


Tracking error

 Large-cap funds' tracking error (risk relative to the benchmark) has also tumbled over the past 10 years. The average tracking error during 2001-2007 was 10%. It shrunk drastically to 3.8% during 2008-2017. This is not surprising.


The pressure of higher AUMs (assets under management) has led to managers becoming risk averse and finding comfort in benchmark hugging. In the new Sebi regime, as managers have to select 50-60 names from a limited universe of 100 companies, this problem will only compound.


Expense ratio

 Expense ratios have not come down even as the average alpha has fallen. The average expense ratio of large-cap funds was 2.35% in August 2017—the average excess returns were 2.9% for the 3-year period ending in August 2017. This means that gross alpha was 5.25%, and half of it was eaten away by fund management fee!

 

Alpha still persists in mid- and multi-caps

 These funds score in terms of risk-adjusted performance and alpha. The information ratio, which essentially displays the risk-adjusted performance of a fund, is low for large-cap funds as compared to multi-cap funds—10-, 5- and 3-year information ratios for large-caps are 0.47, 0.34 and 0.31 respectively; for multi-caps the ratios are 0.75, 0.65 and 0.78.
 

Mid-cap stocks are less well tracked by analysts and managers still focus on bottom-up stock picking, taking large active weights relative to the benchmark, which is why alpha persists in this category and is likely to. Large-caps as a category will be a significant part of the investors' allocations, given that mutual fund penetration is taking off, it is important for the industry to get this asset class right. 

The traditional benchmark-hugging large-cap funds have to become more cost-efficient, given their shrinking alpha, else they will be replaced by passive and smart beta funds, which have already won the performance battle globally. 

Investors should look at the large-cap category for cost-efficient, market-plus returns and, for high alpha, turn to the multi- and mid-cap categories. Within multi- and midcaps, they should focus on funds that significantly deviate from the benchmark. 

Investors can also look at a growing set of non-traditional sources of large-cap exposure, including alternative funds and dynamic equity allocation funds which don't hug the benchmark and deliver superior risk-adjusted returns.

Happy Investing
Source:Moneycontrol.com
 

 H